Download the PDF version

After leaving the US Federal Reserve, former Chairman Ben Bernanke described his mindset during the global financial Crisis in terms of outside-the-box results: “We knew we had to step away from orthodox policies and bring new solutions to the table.”

During the past weeks, global central bankers and fiscal policy makers have been engaged in an existential battle against market dysfunction. At first, these actions aimed to reactivate GFC-era vehicles in order to re-liquefy risk markets while also providing financial support to businesses, local governments and households in need. Having depleted the old playbook amid an increasingly severe crisis, global policymakers devised bold new programs to defend against spreading economic dislocation.

You can find this long and ever-growing list of old and new global stimulus programs and policies in numerous places. Their net result is that the amount of capital being thrown at the global financial system is massive and without precedent. For example, the amount of Fed asset purchases on any single day this week surpasses the amount the central bank bought in any month in 2008. And remember the massive 2009 fiscal package? Well, double it and then some and you’ll approximate the size of the fiscal floodtide it is hoped will lift the US economy. Other countries are going big as well. It’s a global stimulus-palooza!

It’s big. But will it work?

Like in past crises, policymakers first looked to solve liquidity problems in critical markets, such as the money and commercial paper markets. Lack of liquidity, they reasoned, can’t be allowed to prevent broad credit markets from functioning. Although progress has been limited thus far, there’s clear evidence of waning stress across most credit markets.

In past recessions or periods of crisis, policymakers looked to encourage “animal spirits” via fiscal stimulus. But the genesis of this downturn and the abrupt end of economic activity has been caused by society’s attempt to mitigate a health crisis, so the challenges we face are different from those of the past. Indeed, central bankers and policymakers can’t incentivize the producer to produce more or the consumer to consume more since what society needs is isolation. Instead, policymakers are trying to aid multiple segments of the economy that are suffering a loss of income. In other words, the traditional stimulus of the past, igniting animal spirits, is at odds with social distancing.

In our view, policymakers may solve a liquidity crisis, and they might. However, we anticipate market bifurcation to grow between the “haves” and the “have nots.” The haves, we believe, are companies that’ve shown that their economic models are defensible. They may be rewarded with above-market-average multiples and below-average debt funding costs. Conversely, we feel the have nots will de-rate and face a higher cost of capital. Innovative though some of these stimulus programs may be, they can’t rejuvenate the spirit of a wounded animal. We believe the economy will need to see the other side of the virus before true animal spirits can return. In the meantime, security selection will probably matter more than ever — or at least more than at any time during our long (and feeling longer all the time) careers.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

MFS or MFS Investment Management refers to MFS Investment Management Canada Limited and MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc.  This article was first published in the United States by MFS. in March 2020 and is distributed in Canada by Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc., with permission. This document is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific financial, tax, insurance, investment, legal or accounting advice and should not be relied upon in that regard and does not constitute a specific offer to buy and/or sell securities.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the fund’s prospectus. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

The views expressed in this commentary are those of the authors and are subject to change at any time. Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an indication of trading intent of any mutual funds managed by Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc. or sub-advised by MFS. These views are not to be considered as investment advice nor should they be considered a recommendation to buy or sell. Information presented has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made with respect to its timeliness or accuracy. This document may contain forward-looking statements about the economy and/or markets; their future performance, strategies or prospects. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, are speculative in nature and cannot be relied upon. They involve inherent risks and uncertainties so it is possible that predictions, forecasts, and projections will not be achieved. A number of important factors could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied this document.  The views expressed in this commentary are those of the authors and are subject to change at any time.

The MFS® logo is a trademark of The Massachusetts Financial Services Company and is used with permission.

© Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc., 2020. Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc., MFS Investment Management Canada Limited and MFS Institutional Advisors Inc are all members of the Sun Life group of companies.