Download the PDF version

In brief:

  • In our view, the process of reopening the U.S. economy in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic may be a complex matching game.
  • The post crisis economy may not resemble the pre-crisis one.
  • In the period ahead, we believe that returns will be lower, growth slower and risks higher, resulting in a challenging environment for risky assets.

At some point, hopefully in the not-too-distant future, the U.S. economy will open back up as the threat from the coronavirus moderates, but that process may present challenges. Here are some that we think will have to be faced first:

  • Some, perhaps many, companies will not survive whatever lockdown period they are facing or may be late to reopen. Thus, some workers will have no job to return to.
  • Some workers may not return to work until their unemployment insurance benefits run out. Consequently, some companies may have to find new and potentially inexperienced (i.e., lower productivity) workers.
  • When companies that produce intermediate goods fail, companies that rely on those goods for their own production will either be out of luck (perhaps resulting in their demise) or have to find new suppliers (a potentially long and costly process).

The reopening process may become a complex matching game: sequentially matching capital and employers with labour - and let us not forget financing - within complex global supply chains, all amid a very low-visibility environment. Indeed, we don’t know how robustly final demand will rebound, what the likelihood of a second wave of infections is, when we might see viable treatments or vaccines, which export and import markets are reopening when and so on. Maybe an analogy is in order. Imagine for a moment that you have the ability to repeatedly go back in time and break the same wine glass repeatedly. As there is an infinite number of ways to break a wine glass, it would break differently each time. However, there would always be only one way to put it back together: piece by piece.

If we wanted to recreate the global economy exactly as it was before COVID-19 broke it, we would need to put all the pieces (capital, employers, labour, financing and supply chains) back together exactly as they were before. In our view, that just is not going to happen. The matching game is too complex, and some of the pieces were not there to begin with. Moreover, recreating that pre-coronavirus world would simply bring back an economy broken in a different way. The just-ended business cycle was one of excessive advantage, underinvestment in productive resources and an overreliance on returning capital to shareholders. It was unsustainable. So against that backdrop how should we think about risky asset valuations going forward as we try to put the broken economy back together in some new form? In our view, equity valuations are derived from three things: profits, growth expectations and the risks a business faces. Companies today are prioritizing liquidity and survival over two of the three key pillars of valuation: growth and profits. In the period ahead, we believe that returns will be lower, growth slower and risks higher, resulting in a challenging environment for risky assets.


MFS or MFS Investment Management refers to MFS Investment Management Canada Limited and MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc.  This article was first published in the United States by MFS. in April 2020 and is distributed in Canada by Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc., with permission. This document is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific financial, tax, insurance, investment, legal or accounting advice and should not be relied upon in that regard and does not constitute a specific offer to buy and/or sell securities.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the fund’s prospectus. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

The views expressed in this commentary are those of the authors and are subject to change at any time. Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an indication of trading intent of any mutual funds managed by Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc. or sub-advised by MFS. These views are not to be considered as investment advice nor should they be considered a recommendation to buy or sell. Information presented has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made with respect to its timeliness or accuracy. This document may contain forward-looking statements about the economy and/or markets; their future performance, strategies or prospects. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, are speculative in nature and cannot be relied upon. They involve inherent risks and uncertainties so it is possible that predictions, forecasts, and projections will not be achieved. A number of important factors could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied this document.  The views expressed in this commentary are those of the authors and are subject to change at any time.

The MFS® logo is a trademark of The Massachusetts Financial Services Company and is used with permission.

© Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc., 2020. Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc., MFS Investment Management Canada Limited and MFS Institutional Advisors Inc are all members of the Sun Life group of companies.