While investment buy or sell recommendations are generally guided by a Client’s unique financial objectives and circumstances, tax is sometimes a key motivator. For instance, we generally believe that investments with an accrued capital loss can be disposed of and the associated capital loss realized is offset against capital gains realized in the current year, with any excess net capital loss available to be carried forward to a future year or carried back to any of the three previous taxation years.  

While the intention may be to benefit from realizing a capital loss in the year, one may inadvertently trip over the complex superficial loss rules. Surprise! This can cause unexpected results. The capital loss that was triggered may not be available now, or in the future.  Or, it may be transferred to somebody else. 

The superficial loss rules serve to prevent the realization of losses where there is no perceived change in beneficial ownership.

Five clues to help avoid tripping over the superficial loss rules

1. Has a capital loss been realized on the disposition of a particular property? Yes or No?
2. Has the same or an identical property been acquired? Yes or No?
3. Was the same or an identical property acquired or the rights to that same or an identical property acquired within 30 calendar days before or after the disposition? Yes or No?
4. Is the same or an identical property still owned or the right to own continues 30 days after the disposition? Yes or No?
5. Who acquired or has the right to acquire the same or an identical property?  There’s no simple yes or no answer, but we’ll address shortly.

If the answer to questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 is ‘yes’, then the superficial loss rules likely apply. 

The answer to question 1 can be readily determined when a property is disposed of. The realization of a capital loss is the starting point for the potential application of the superficial loss rules. 

Let’s, now, dig a little deeper to better understand the impact of the answers to questions 2 through 5.  

There are many considerations to determine whether a property is an ‘identical property’ within the meaning of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (ITA). It is also open to interpretation by the CRA. We recommend consulting with a qualified tax advisor when a capital loss has been incurred related to the disposition of a property, and consideration is being given to purchasing the same property or an identical property. 

What’s the meaning of 30 days before and 30 days after disposition?

The 30-day rule, as depicted in the chart, below, is an important timeframe to keep in mind for a realized capital loss.  

For example, assume you sell 100 shares of ABC with a trade date of June 15, 2022. This trade will settle on June 17, 2022. To avoid triggering the superficial loss rules, you must not acquire any new ABC shares that settle on or after May 18, 2022 and before or on July 17, 2022.

When a capital loss has been realized on the disposition of capital property and an affiliated person has acquired the same or an identical property or has a right to acquire the same or an identical property,

• within 30 days before property was disposed of, or
• within 30 days after the property was disposed of,

and

• the affiliated person continues to hold the property 30 days after the disposition (i.e., on the 61^st day depicted in the chart, above),

the superficial loss rules will apply.  

Who acquired or has the right to acquire the same or an identical property?

The ‘who’ is an affiliated person.  

Because it’s more straight forward, we’ll begin with who is NOT an affiliated person – parents, grandparents, siblings and children and grandchildren. Affiliated persons include⁴: the individual and himself/herself; an individual and their spouse or common-law partner; a corporation and the person who controls the corporation, and their spouse or common-law partner; a partnership and the majority-interest partner, and their spouse or common-law partner; and a trust and the majority-interest beneficiary, and their spouse or common-law partner. 

Let’s consider an example: 

• Ann and Jason are married,
• Ann sold (i.e., trade settled) 100 shares of XYZ Company on Day 31 and realized a capital loss,
• Jason purchased (i.e., trade settled) 100 shares in XYZ Company on Day 20, and
• Jason continued to own the 100 shares in XYZ Company on Day 61 (being 30 days after Ann’s disposition)

Will the superficial loss rules apply?  Let’s consider questions outlined earlier:

1. Has a capital loss been realized on the disposition of a particular property? Yes
2. Has the same or an identical property been acquired? Yes
3. Was the same or an identical property acquired or there’s a right to acquire within 30 days before or after the disposition? Yes
4. Who acquired or has the right to acquire? Jason, an affiliated person
5. Is the same or identical property still owned or the right to own continues 30 days after the disposition? Yes

Based on these answers, the superficial loss rules apply. The capital loss realized by Ann on the disposition of her shares of XYZ Company is deemed nil. 

Will Ann ever be able to claim the capital loss? We’ll return to this example later.

Once it’s been determined that the superficial loss rules apply, the next step is to figure out if the loss is suspended (i.e., the loss may be used at a future date) or denied (i.e., the loss will never be recognized). 

Denied

A loss is denied if the same or an identical property is purchased within or transferred to a registered account, such as a RRSP, RRIF, TFSA, RESP, etc. 

Suspended

A loss is suspended when the same or an identical property is purchased by or transferred to an affiliated person, other than in connection with a registered account. 

The loss will be suspended until the same or an identical property is disposed of by the affiliated person. 

Who gets to recognize the loss depends upon who acquired (by way of a purchase or transfer) the same or an identical property: 

• If the affiliated person is the spouse or common-law partner or the person who disposed of the property – remember you are affiliated with yourself – the loss is effectively recognized by the purchaser or transferee. Because the loss that was originally denied is added to the cost base of the property acquired.
• If the affiliated person is a corporation, trust, partnership, person who controls a corporation, trust or partnership or their spouse or common-law partner or the individual and their spouse or common-law partner, the loss will be recognized by the original owner or transferor. 

Let’s revisit the above example:

Ann sold 100 shares of XYZ Company and realized a capital loss and Jason purchased 100 shares of XYZ Company and continued to hold the property 30 days after Ann’s disposition. 

Let’s further assume that Ann realized a $5,000 capital loss and Jason purchased 100 shares at a cost of $15,000. 

Jason sold 100 shares of XYZ Company the following year for $25,000.  In that year, Jason will report a capital gain on disposition of $5,000.  Ann’s loss is deemed nil and is effectively’ transferred to Jason – the capital gain that he may have otherwise reported (i.e., proceeds of $25,000 – purchase price of $15,000 = $10,000) is reduced by the amount of Ann’s loss.

Although these rules are somewhat punitive and the impact may lead to an unexpected result, some circumstances exist where the rules can be used to benefit a family unit. Working with the client and a qualified tax advisor to navigate these complex rules is recommended.

A few key questions to contemplate when the client has unrealized losses in any of their non-registered investment portfolios:

• Has a capital gain been realized in the current taxation year?  (Capital losses are offset against capital gains realized or capital gains dividends (e.g., via mutual fund year-end distributions) received in the same calendar year. Any excess remaining is the ‘net capital loss’.)
• Have capital gains been realized in any of the past three taxation years?  (Net capital losses can be carried back to any of the three prior taxation years to offset capital gains realized in those years using Form T1A, Request for Loss Carryback.)
• Is a capital gain anticipated in the future? (Net capital losses can be carried forward indefinitely to offset future capital gains realized.)
• If the client has a spouse or common-law partner, can they answer ‘yes’ to any of the three preceding questions? (If so, there may be an opportunity to employ the superficial loss rules t.o their advantage.)
• Is consideration being given to invest in the same or identical property within 30 days of a disposition within an affiliated account?  (If so, can the acquisition be delayed beyond 31 days from disposition or invested using an alternative vehicle, such as a segregated fund contract or corporate class mutual fund, which is invested in the same or similar funds, yet not presently considered the same or an identical property from an income tax perspective?)
• Have you considered trade settlement and holidays when calculating the 30-day period?
• If the superficial loss rules have been triggered in a transaction involving a corporation, partnership or trust, and the loss is suspended, can the substituted property be disposed of in the same taxation year? (The capital loss is suspended until the same or identical property is disposed of.)